USS Liberty Veterans Association BANNED FOREVER From the American Legion National Convention

USS Liberty Veterans Association BANNED FOREVER From the American Legion National Convention

An American Legion membership card fluttering down and landing softly on the blouse of an American Legion clerk results in the USS Liberty Veterans Association being BANNED from The American Legion National Convention FOREVER.

by Joe Meadors

“You will not discuss the attack with anyone. Once the Court of Inquiry findings are released you will not contradict them. This order will remain in effect after you are discharged from the Navy. If you violate this order you will be prosecuted and will spend a considerable amount of time in a Federal Prison.”

This order was repeated every day at quarters while we were in drydock in Malta.

If anyone tells of witnessing the deliberate machine gunning of our life rafts in the water, he runs the risk of doing time in a Federal prison.

If anyone tells of witnessing the use of unmarked aircraft or of the jamming of our radios on both US Navy tactical and international maritime distress frequencies, he runs the risk of doing time in a Federal prison.

We cannot talk about this among ourselves. We cannot talk about this with our family. We cannot talk about this with any counselor. We cannot talk about this at a meeting of any veterans group we may become involved with. We cannot talk about this with our Congressional Delegation. We cannot talk about this at The American Legion National Convention.

We cannot talk about this with anyone.

If we do, we risk Federal prison.

Kevin J. Bartlett, J.D., National Judge Advocate of The American Legion

But we defy the Federal Government and speak about the attack anywhere we can.

But now we cannot talk about it at The American Legion National Convention.

 In an email to the USS Liberty Veterans Association, Kevin J. Bartlett, J.D., National Judge Advocate of The American Legion (and US Navy Veteran) writes:

“I understand that your organization would like to submit an application for a booth at The American Legion National Convention in August.

“The USS Liberty Association is not allowed to rent a booth at national conventions and have them staffed because one of your members committed assault and battery on one of our staff and was convicted of his crimes.  In addition, members of your organization have attempted to set up in the national convention exhibit hall without renting a booth.

“The American Legion has a 100-year track record of helping veterans and their families. Unfortunately, we’ve had a long and unpleasant history with the USS Liberty Veterans Association, and we have chosen not to do business with them.”

The American Legion has known for decades the constraints we have had place on us. Do they care? No.

Instead of offering us the honor, support and compassion they routinely offer their members, they have chosen to take an relatively minor issue that was largely of their making, blow it all out of proportion, accuse someone they claim to be a USS Liberty survivor of trying to set up an unauthorized booth and ban us from their National Convention forever.

All without the opportunity of appealing their decision. And without any reference to their Constitution and bylaws or Resolution that allows them to take the action they did.

This action by the hired help of The American Legion National Headquarters wasn’t taken in a vacuum. The National Organization has a long record of trying to stifle USS Liberty survivors in our effort to tell the story of what happened on a US Navy ship. Given the tremendous support we have from the rank and file of The American Legion, it is clear that The American Legion National Headquarters is governing by fiat instead of by the rule of its membership as reflected in Resolutions initiated by its local posts.

An extensive and heavily footnoted telling of the history between The American Legion and the USS Liberty Veterans Association is available here.  We are indebted to If Americans Knew for the effort they made to so expertly outline the history between the two veterans groups.

IAK writes:

Legion bigwigs have torpedoed American Legion members’ resolutions supporting the Liberty; prevented dissemination of information about the attack; refused to allow a booth by the Liberty Veterans Association at its 2013 national convention; and privately attempted to convince the Veterans of Foreign Wars to similarly prohibit a Liberty booth at its national convention.”

“In 2002 the Washington DC Legion delegation introduced a resolution calling for an investigation of the attack to a foreign relations subcommittee at the national convention. This was the first step towards procuring an American Legion resolution.

“I was present at this convention and witnessed most of what subsequently transpired. I had begun to investigate Israel-Palestine in fall 2000, a topic I had never previously studied. I was astonished at much of what I discovered, including the Israeli attack on the Liberty, which I had never heard about despite growing up in a military family.

“When I heard that a resolution was going to be introduced at the national convention, I went with the delegation to observe what happened.

“When the DC group introduced the resolution to the subcommittee, every American Legion delegate who addressed it spoke in favor of it. Delegate after delegate from diverse parts of America supported the resolution, and it was passed without objection.

“The DC delegates were jubilant. When a resolution is passed at this level, they explained, it is virtually assured of adoption. Typically, the resolution is then rubber-stamped by the next committee, and passed along to the general membership, which then normally passes all such committee recommended resolutions by one simple voice vote.

“This resolution, however, was to be different.

“The next day, American Legion staff told the Convention Committee on Foreign Relations that there was no need for such a resolution since the Legion already had passed resolutions on the Liberty. The staff and chair neglected to state that not a single resolution on the USS Liberty was live, and that therefore it was both necessary and appropriate to pass this one.

“This communication succeeded in killing the resolution. The main staff member for this committee had served in Israel; it is possible he is an Israeli citizen. The Committee chairman was Thomas Bock, of Colorado.[29] Three years later Bock was American Legion National Commander.

That evening, back in D.C., Admiral Thomas Moorer (USN retired) heard about the scuttling of the resolution. Outraged, he wrote an open letter to the American Legion Commander requesting that the resolution be put before the general membership.

Admiral Moorer was chairman of an association of admirals and generals who want the US government to conduct a hearing on the USS Liberty. He was also the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff — the highest ranking military officer in the U.S. military — and a retired 4-star admiral who was once in charge of both the Pacific and Atlantic fleets. He was a Naval aviator and World War II hero; the Navy’s Tomcat fighter jet was named after him.

“Moorer had long been outraged at the cover-up on the Liberty attack. In a 1997 memo, he called it a “wanton, sneak attack,” writing: “What is so chilling and cold-blooded, of course, is that they could kill as many Americans as they did in confidence that Washington would cooperate in quelling any public outcry.” Many of the crewmembers, Moorer wrote, were from “small country towns, probably a lot like Eufaula, Alabama, where I grew up, and they represent the basic core of America …. “”

One has only to look to their reference to the USS Liberty in their Leadership FAQ to learn that they have chosen to support a Revisionist version of the attack instead of one supported by evidence and facts.

What is The American Legion doing about the USS Liberty tragedy?

The tragic mistaken identity attack by Israelis on the USS Liberty on June 8, 1967 provoked a great deal of controversy among surviving members of the crew and family members. Though residual anger and suspicions remain, the incident was the subject of ten US investigations and three by the Israelis. In the American investigations, the full weight of the US Government allowed access to all of the relevant security information. Though some accusations were made suggesting the reports sought to hide facts or protect Israel, no credible evidence for these charges has been produced at the US Government level.

The Foreign Relations Convention Committee of The American Legion reviewed the action taken by OSD and Congress on this incident and they voted to reject Resolution 235 submitted by the Department of District of Columbia at the 84th Annual National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina, August 2002.

This position is a gross misrepresentation of the evidence currently available – a fact that we have made The American Legion aware of but they are obviously not interested in acknowledging.

In the first place, there is no “controversy among surviving members of the crew and family members.”

Second, the incident was NOT “the subject of ten US investigations and three by the Israelis.” Prove that for yourself by emailing your Congressional Delegation and ask them to send you a copy of the Congressional investigation of the attack. They won’t be able to send you one because it doesn’t exist.

Third, Congress hasn’t taken any action on this “incident” so what the Foreign Relations Convention Committee reviewed is in question. A question The American Legion refuses to (i.e., cannot) answer.

Why would the leaders of a Federally chartered veterans association claiming a mission “To uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America,” “To foster and perpetuate a one hundred percent Americanism,” and “To make right the master of might” ban a group of American veterans who are the victims of War Crimes committed by our “best ally and only friend in the Middle East” from attending any American Legion National Convention forever?

Did I just answer my own question?

Are the leaders of The American Legion afraid that their members will learn about the War Crimes Israel committed during the attack and are blowing up this relatively minor event to prevent our relating the history of the attack during their National Convention?

This unilateral action by The American Legion was not taken in a vacuum.  The American Legion and the USS Liberty Veterans Association have a long history.  That history, in our opinion, shows a concerted, illegal and borderline treasonous effort by The American Legion National Organization to deny its members the right of hearing first-hand accounts of the attack on the USS Liberty.

To be perfectly clear, no one is denying the seriousness of a charge of assault and battery.  Nobody is denying the fact that a USS Liberty survivor was convicted of assault and battery on a staff member of The American Legion.

What happened that resulted in the assault and battery being committed?  It all takes place as we were attempting to register at the 2012 National Convention.

Due to a communications error on our part, our delegation intending to staff our booth at the 2012 American Legion National Convention was unaware that payment for that booth and information about the requisite insurance had not been submitted to The American Legion prior to their arrival.

Upon learning that the payment had not been made, our representatives inquired if payment could be made while they were there.

Instead of responding to the inquiry, the registration desk called their security personnel who asked that our delegation be removed from the premises. The security personnel were obviously expert in intimidation – which was in full flower during the one-sided confrontation.

Having survived not only the attack and the US government’s disinterest in investigating that attack, but the history the USS Liberty Veterans Association has had with the higher-ups of The American Legion, one of our representatives out of frustration, took out his American Legion membership card and flicked it to no one in particular. He just wanted to be rid of it.

As luck would have it, it landed softly on the blouse of one of the ladies manning the registration desk. So soft that I doubt she felt a thing.

The American Legion called the police and had our representative arrested for assault and battery. He was taken to jail and released after receiving a court date.

When the date arrived to face the judge, our guy showed but The American Legion victim was nowhere to be found.

No doubt out of embarrassment that the very people The American Legion was established to help were being treated so poorly.

Which brings up the question, “What is the purpose of The American Legion” and why in the past 52+ years has The American Legion treated the survivors of the USS Liberty as an exception to that purpose?

Why has The American Legion National Organization shown more concern for the forces who attacked the USS Liberty than it has for their own countrymen?

Why has The American Legion National Organization felt it so important to stifle USS Liberty survivors that they have acted illegally to do so?

Let me suggest some reasons:

  1. We were attacked by Israel.
  2. We have insisted that The American Legion live up to its obligations as described in the Preamble to their Constitution.
  3. We were attacked by Israel.
  4. We have highlighted the hypocrisy of The American Legion in allowing its 1967 Resolution 508 to be ignored and unimplemented until it is finally rescinded in the 1990’s.
  5. We were attacked by Israel.
  6. During the many times we were allowed to purchase a booth at The American Legion’s National Convention we were welcomed with enthusiasm and support by the general membership of The American Legion.
  7. We were attacked by Israel.
  8. At their 2018 National Convention, the membership of The American Legion ignored the recommendation of The American Legion’s leaders and approved a resolution calling on the Congress of the United States to investigate the attack on our ship.
  9. We were attacked by Israel.

If you find the actions of The American Legion National Organization as disconcerting as we do, we urge you to submit two resolutions through your Post.

If nothing else, it will educate you on what The American Legion National Organization feels about the USS Liberty and USS Liberty resolutions.

US Government Investigation of USS Liberty Attack Will Not Receive Israel Imprimatur

US Government Investigation of USS Liberty Attack Will Not Receive Israel Imprimatur

by Joe Meadors

Israel wants to be the final arbiter of what is available anywhere about Israel.

Write something Hasbara doesn’t like?  You’re condemned as an “anti-Semite” and your YouTube videos are removed

Evidence the YouTube video created by If Americans Knew.

This is version 2 of the video.  Version 1 was deleted which led to version 2 being uploaded by IAK which has led to version 3 which will lead to. . . .

Is that why the US government has not investigated the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty?

We know that Israel rushed the “Yerushalmi Report” into print without any evidence or testimony to support its findings.  Clearly, it was written out of whole cloth.  The rotten fruit of a fertile imagination.

But that served its purpose by setting the standard by which all US government investigations will be judged

No US government investigation can question or contradict what the Israelis claim in the “Yerushalmi Report” or subsequent Israeli “investigations.”  To do so is clearly “anti-Semitic.”

The truth be damned.

Don’t contradict the Israelis.

Sen. John Cornyn Changes His Tune

Sen. John Cornyn Changes His Tune

by Joe Meadors

We have achieved a level of success.  Congress is slowly changing its USS Liberty boilerplate.

Our effort to make it clear that neither Congress specifically nor the US government in general has conducted an investigation of the June 8, 1967, Israeli attack on the USS Liberty has gotten some traction among those who draft Congressional boilerplates.

Previously, Members of Congress would ignore the questions about the USS Liberty that were asked and replied by claiming that the attack has been investigated, Israel was completely absolved, and the US has no interest in conducting another investigation.

This even if inquiries were made by USS Liberty Survivors.

If you haven’t asked for a copy of the investigation of the attack on the USS Liberty, please do so now.  Click here, here and here.  You will be sending emails to your Congressional Delegation and to the Historians of both the US House and US Senate asking them to send you a copy of the investigation of the attack on our ship.

In their response, they should tell you they cannot find any.

You can read the letter I recently received from Senator John Cornyn where  he didn’t refer to any investigation but he did try to divert my attention to some other USS Liberty information.

To which I replied:

The Honorable John Cornyn
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator Cornyn:

Thank you for your letter of July 11, 2019.

We appreciate your providing us with the URL of the NSA website containing USS Liberty documents.

If you will visit that page you will notice a document titled, “Station has voice tapes.”  We have repeatedly requested the NSA to provide us with a copy of the voice tapes referenced in that message.

The NSA has refused to provide us with a copy of the voice tapes even to the extent of telling us that any future FOIA requests from us will simply be ignored by the NSA.

Could you obtain a copy of the referenced voice tapes and send them to me?

Also, my request that elicited your July 11th  letter was to have you provide us with a copy of the Congressional investigation of the June 8, 1967, Israeli attack on the USS Liberty and to contact the Congressional Research Service and request that they provide us with a copy of the US government investigation of the attack on the USS Liberty.

That request remains outstanding.

Can I anticipate receiving a copy of those investigations soon?

Warmest regards,

Joe Meadors
USS Liberty Survivor
Director of Operations, USS Liberty Veterans Association

How Does This Violate Quora.Com’s “Be Nice, Be Polite” Rule?

How Does This Violate Quora.Com’s “Be Nice, Be Polite” Rule?

by Joe Meadors

This morning I checked into my Quora.com account to see if there was anything interesting I could comment on.

To no one’s surprise, I found yet another poster claiming that the US government has conducted an investigation of the attack on our ship.  To prove it he posted a link to a Wikipedia article along with condemning everyone who disagrees with him as an anti-Semite.

Since we prefer to base our position on personal accounts as well as official US government documents and not on the opinions of anonymous authors writing in an online publication that does not insist that articles be correct, I wrote a reply to the comment and posted it to the original poster.

I barely had time to do a screen print to verify that the post had been made before I was notified that my post had been deleted.

Were I not on that page at the time I would not know that the post was deleted.  Quora.com doesn’t tell me when they delete my posts.  They’ve deleted a number of mine without telling me.

I’ve appealed their decision and asked why my comment was deleted.  I anticipate a boilerplate response that ignores the question I asked.

I am posting my deleted comment below.

You tell me.

How does it violate Quora.com’s “Be Nice, Be Polite” rule?

Of course, everyone is invited to take the actions I refer to in my post below.  Indeed, I hope everyone will not only take the action but encourage your friends and neighbors to take the actions as well.


The claim that the US government has conducted any number of investigations of the June 8, 1967, Israeli attack on the USS Liberty is provably false.

In only a few minutes, anyone can prove it is false by contacting the US government instead of relying upon the opinions of intermediaries such as the authors of a Wikipedia article or of a book written by someone who failed to interview any USS Liberty survivors.

Contact your Congressional Delegation and ask them to send you a copy of the Congressional investigation of the attack.

You will receive no such document.

Contact your Congressional Delegation and have them request the Congressional Research Service to send you a copy of the US government’s investigation of the attack.

You will receive no such document.

Contact the Historians of the US House and US Senate and ask for a copy of the Congressional investigation of the attack.

You will receive no such document.

The closest report to a US government investigation of the June 8, 1967, Israeli attack on the USS Liberty is the US Navy Court of Inquiry that was conducted as a result of the attack.

In a March 6, 2005, Letter from Capt. Jane G. Dalton, USN, JAGC to Congressman Rob Simmons, Capt. Dalton writes, “The Court of Inquiry was the only United States Government investigation into the attack..”

That is not to suggest that the US Navy Court of Inquiry Report doesn’t have its detractors.  One of the most vocal is then-Captain Merlin Staring who at the time of the attack was serving as the Legal Advisor to ADM John S. McCain, Jr. who as CINCUSNAVEUR was the Convening Authority who established the Court of Inquiry.

In a July 27, 2005 letter to the Secretary of the Navy, Staring writes an excoriating rebuke of the US Navy Court of Inquiry Report.  Merlin Staring is not some johnny-come-lately who has no basis to criticize the Report.  He later rose to the position of US Navy Judge Advocate General.

Some selective quotes from RADM Staring’s letter of many available:

“We most respectfully submit, Mr. Secretary, that such a position by the Department of the Navy  – if it is to be construed as a firm and considered determination – can only be adopted by ignoring a complex of evidence and circumstances that demonstrate the utter inadequacy and unreliability of the investigative proceedings conducted by the Navy Court of lnquiry of June 1967 – to put the kindest face on the record of those Proceedings.”

“Some of the few crewmen whose testimony was in fact recorded included in their sworn testimony factual observations concerning the attack which were eliminated by the Court from its written record or were otherwise subsequently redacted from the Court’s record as it is now officially held and acknowledged by the Government.”

“Some of the LIBERTY crewmen who did have an opportunity to testify before the Court attempted to respond in full, or to include in or add to their accounts factual observations which would have been clearly relevant to the ‘pertinent facts and circumstances . . . connected with the armed attack’ that the Court had been charged with eliciting — but were stopped and expressly forbidden by the Court to testify further in those areas.”

“We would first note that the U.S. Navy commander who appointed the Court of Inquiry directed it ‘to inquire into all the pertinent facts and circumstances leading to and connected with‚ the armed attack[, the] damage resulting therefrom[, and the] deaths of and injuries to naval personnel.’ In contrast to the fully waranted and completely justified breadth of that investigative assignment, the recent letter from your Department to the Congress purports to restate – and, in the process, seeks to narrow – both the scope and significance of that Court of Inquiry investigation. Noting simply that the Court had been ordered ‘to investigate the circumstances surrounding the attack,’ it told the Congress that the investigation had ‘focused primarily on U.S. military communications problems prior to the attack’ and upon ‘the heroic efforts of LIBERTY’S crew in damage control during the aftermath of the attack.’ To the extent that these latter representations may be true, they constitute in themselves an acknowledgment that the 1967 Court of Inquiry fell far short of inquiring into ‘all the pertinent facts and circumstances leading to and connected with the armed attack,’ as had been clearly directed by the Convening Authority.”

Jewish Virtual Library Perpetuates Myth About USS Liberty Attack

Jewish Virtual Library Perpetuates Myth About USS Liberty Attack
by Joe Meadors

Myth Synonyms: delusion, error, fallacy, falsehood, falsity, hallucination, illusion, misbelief, misconception, old wives’ tale, untruth.

Fact Synonyms: actuality, case, materiality, reality.

USS Liberty Entry in Myths & Facts Copyright © American Israeli Cooperative Enterprise (AICE) Inc., 2017 Used Under Provisions of fair use principles in U.S. copyright laws.

USS Liberty Entry in Myths & Facts Copyright © American Israeli Cooperative Enterprise (AICE) Inc., 2017 Used Under Provisions of fair use principles in U.S. copyright laws.

 

The Jewish Virtual Library publishes Myths and Facts A Guide to the Arab-Israel Conflict describing it as “The most comprehensive and informative book explaining the intracacies [sic] of the Arab-Israeli Conflict throughout history.”

Dr. Mitchell G. Bard, Founder and Executive Director of The American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise who wrote the screed goes to extensive lengths to try to prove that the attack on the USS Liberty was not the premeditated, deliberate and illegal attack that we know it was.

All to no avail.

He has an entire page of “investigations” of the “incident” but nowhere does he tell you that none of the reports was prepared following an investigation of the attack.

Why does he omit such a relevant fact?

Simple.  He wants you to believe the US government has investigated the attack.

It has not.

Do what Dr. Bard is afraid to do himself and hopes you don’t.

Prove it from an official US government source – the Congressional Research Service.

Requests to the Congressional Research Service must be initiated by a Member of Congress so you’ll have to go through your Congressional Delegation to contact them.

We’ve taken the effort out of the process and automated it for you.  All you have to do is to CLICK HERE and send the email we’ve prepared.

Then share this post with anyone you feel may be interested in helping us in our effort to ensure the truth about the USS Liberty attack is finally known to the American people.

The ADL’s Connecticut Office Lies About the USS Liberty Attack

The ADL’s Connecticut Office Lies About the USS Liberty Attack

by Joe Meadors, USS Liberty Survivor

Andy Friedland

Andy Friedland, Assistant Director at the Anti-Defamation in the League’s Connecticut Office, has lied about the US government’s conduct following the attack on the USS Liberty.

In a February 27th letter to the editor of the Post-Chronicle, Mr Friedland writes that “Several government investigations have concluded that the attack [on the USS Liberty] was carried out in error.”

Given that it is almost 51 years since the attack it is hard to believe that Mr. Friedland’s effort is nothing more than an effort to perpetuate the myth created by Jay Cristol that claims the US government has conducted many investigations of the attack on our ship.

In my letter to the editor response to Mr. Friedland which at this writing has not been published I write:

Andy Friedland’s reference to the USS Liberty attack in his letter of February 27th leaves the reader with the impression that the US government has conducted a number of investigations of the attack on our ship.

It has not.

House and Senate historians cannot find any reference to a Congressional investigation of the attack on our ship.

Neither can the Congressional Research Service.

Had the attack already been investigated, we wouldn’t still be trying to convince the US government that an attack on a US Navy ship that includes the use of unmarked aircraft, the jamming of our radios on both US Navy tactical and international maritime distress frequencies and the deliberate machine gunning of our life rafts in the water warrants Congressional scrutiny.

We hope that the Post-Chronicle will assign an investigative reporter to independently verify the facts we have presented by contacting official US government sources.

While I doubt Mr. Friendland will be moved to conduct the research I am asking the Post-Chronicle to do, I hope the Post-Chronicle will deem the claims made by USS Liberty survivors credible enough to do as we ask and research the claim by contacting official US government sources.

You can help us by politely encouraging the Post-Chronicle through their email address at [email protected].